Assessment form master thesis in international relations

phd thesis evaluation report in india

During the first semester of the second year of studies, the student is expected to start work on the thesis and, by the end of the semester, to submit a thesis proposal to the primary supervisor. A thesis bears a close correspondence to an academic monograph substantiating a specific view.

master thesis international relations pdf

The final version of the thesis is submitted to the first supervisor. The Thesis Kitchen Tutorial Group intends to guide you through the thesis writing process without any delays.

Frits Meijerink. Packed with the knowledge and skills you have acquired and expanded during your MA it is now time to show whether you indeed may call yourself a Master in International Relations.

A number of meetings and subsequent revisions may be needed before the thesis is considered to meet the required standards.

topics for thesis in international relations

Please let us know. The committee decides a whether the thesis is acceptable or not in strict accordance with examination criteria herein. As a whole, the thesis is stylistically excellent and consistent.

Phd thesis evaluation report sample india

Therefore, when you start writing your thesis you will have to hand in the Plagiarism rules awareness statement pdf. Writing a final thesis is in fact a comparable exercise. The research data matches the study purposes. Once the suggested revisions have been implemented, the first supervisor hands the revised version to the second supervisor. Actual supervision starts with the first supervisor discussing the thesis proposal with the student in depth, possibly leading to improvements. Procedure Each thesis is supervised by two faculty members of the Department of Political Science at Leiden University. The table of contents page must correspondingly give a clear indication of the structure of the thesis. In the oral examination, the student may be questioned on any aspect of the thesis and will be asked to elaborate upon or defend issues arising from the literature review and the research plan contained in the thesis. Argument: The student must present a thesis and its reasoned defense. The student and the first supervisor agree on a schedule and the ways in which supervision is to take place. The data has been processed well and almost faultlessly. Research Thesis, Research Track When writing a research thesis we expect you to offer something extra. Utrecht University expects each student to be familiar with and to observe the norms and values that ensure academic integrity. It must also be clear that the student has a good understanding of the literature.

Supervision may vary from frequent meetings, e. It must be written in English and the literary presentation must be satisfactory.

You will be given notice by the first evaluator that a third evaluator has been employed and that the grading period of 10 working days will be extended by another 10 working days.

Thesis criteria

Fraud and plagiarism Utrecht University considers any form of academic dishonesty to be a serious offense. The theoretical background is meritorious and diversified and has a high quality. Although discussion as a whole is quite scanty, it does include pointers to possible applications. Students are free in the selection of the topic for the thesis, but must do so in consultation with potential thesis supervisors. Once the first supervisor considers the thesis to meet all basic requirements, it is submitted also to the second supervisor for evaluation. Writing a final thesis is in fact a comparable exercise. Only the members of the committee may be present during the post-examination session. The bibliography must accurately represent all sources and reading. There is a lot to remark on the thesis on all levels, with deficiencies and obvious errors. The second supervisor may be consulted in crucial stages of the research, by the first supervisor or in a discussion in which the student also participates. Once both supervisors agree with the outline, a meeting is scheduled with the student in which the first supervisor, and if possible also the second supervisor, participate. The judgement of the third evaluator is binding. It must also be clear that the student has a good understanding of the literature. Last updated:

The second supervisor co-decides about the approval of the thesis proposal and about the thesis assessment and grade, and can be consulted during the process of research and writing.

Rated 7/10 based on 20 review
International Relations and Diplomacy Master Thesis,